应用思考-教育技术论坛

标题: 有必要花这么多精力探讨术语么? [打印本页]

作者: utkfan    时间: 2011-5-29 02:10
标题: 有必要花这么多精力探讨术语么?
本帖最后由 utkfan 于 2011-5-29 10:23 编辑

在这个坛里看到这么多关于教育技术,教学技术,技术设计 / educational technology, instructional technology 术语的定义和探讨,非常惊讶。

本人的看法是:浪费时间。

委婉一点的说法是, 不需要这么多人,花这么多精力去探讨术语 / taxomony,或者教育技术历史,行业协会。

先说一下科技:纸,笔,黑板,电子白板,网络,电脑,智能手机,计算器等等,全都是科技。当前,现在提到的科技我们默认为电脑和网络。因为它们给社会带来了巨大的变革,因此很多人对把它们应用于教育也非常乐观,希望它们也能给教育带来革命。

在我看来,如果希望了解教育技术,以下书籍和文章就可以勾勒一下。链接提供的是简解

历史:
Anglin, G. J. (ed.), (1995). Instructional technology: Past, present, and future. 2nd ed. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.

电脑和网络可以给教育带来什么:
Pfaffman, J. (2008). Computer-mediated communications technologies. In J. Spectors, M. Merrill, J. Merrienboer and M. Driscoll (Eds), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3rd ed, pp211-231. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
http://tech-discussion.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=17&p=17&hilit=pfaffman#p17

电脑和网络可以给教育带来什么:
Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Research in Learning Technology. 12(2), 113-124.
http://tech-discussion.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=477

教育技术研究趋势:
Winn, W. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 331-351.
http://tech-discussion.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=469

教育技术研究方向
Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Educational technology research that makes a difference: Series introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 192-201.
http://tech-discussion.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=465

有人不讨论术语,但是已经开始研究电脑和网络对教育的影响,影响比较大的有 Larry Cuban 和 Henry Becker。两人在90年代论战。比较醒目的文章有

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 813—834.

可以下载
http://faculty.ed.uiuc.edu/m-osbor/507SE06/cubantech.pdf

Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey: Is Larry Cuban Right?Education Policy Analysis Archives, Volume 8 Number 51.

可以下载
http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf

Becker 说的:“Cuban (1986; 2000) has argued that computers are largely incompatible with the equirements of teaching, and that, for the most part, teachers will continue to reject their use as instruments of student work during class.”

有个 Clark,发出著名的:
“The best current evidence is that media are mere vehicles that deliver instruction but do not influence student achievement any more than the truck that delivers our groceries causes changes in our nutrition.”


Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media Review of Educational Research, Vol. 53, No. 4., pp. 445-459.

看完这些东西,对教育技术就有底了。
作者: utkfan    时间: 2011-5-29 19:17
该看的,可以看的东西太多,我们的时间和精力太少,真的没有时间花在 taxonomy 上:

Educational Technology Research & Development
Educational Technology
Educational Technology Publications
Performance Improvement Quarterly
TechTrends
Performance Improvement Journal
Journal of Educational Psychology
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Instructional Science
Educational Researcher
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Journal of Research in Technology Education
British Journal of Educational Technology
Quarterly Review of Distance Education
America Journal of Distance Education
Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
Review of Educational Research
作者: utkfan    时间: 2011-5-29 20:50
关于技术融合/接纳模型,光徐教授归纳的都有6种,不包括她自己的模型。

http://tech-discussion.com/viewt ... =479&p=599#p599

教育科技的世界这么大,何必去探究自己不喜欢的东西
作者: utkfan    时间: 2011-5-30 10:48
云计算和Google Chromebook,社交网络构建学习环境(Facebook),iPad 或智能手机等移动设备构建移动学习环境,Kindle 等电子书构建个人移动知识管理库,Moodle 建立知识管理,哪个不比那些枯燥的术语更重要,更让人感兴趣?
作者: utkfan    时间: 2011-5-30 21:52
看看几个网站:

http://www.khanacademy.org/
2100 个以上录像教材,涵盖代数,几何,生物等内容。这些录像都挂在 Youtube 上

http://www.classroom20.com/
讨论电脑和网络应用,涵盖 Blog, Calendar, Collaborative documents, Collaborative idea maps, Collaborative spreadsheets,你能想到的网络工具都有讨论。有的还组成兴趣小组。成员来自全球,非常多一线教师讨论心得,非常值得看。
作者: keaimeimei42060    时间: 2011-5-31 11:12
您的网站真的非常好,多谢您
作者: utkfan    时间: 2011-6-4 03:36
额,太客气了。互联网就是分享。




欢迎光临 应用思考-教育技术论坛 (http://etthink.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.4